Available at: https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/theses/3349
Date of Award
6-2026
Degree Name
MS in Civil and Environmental Engineering
Department/Program
Civil and Environmental Engineering
College
College of Engineering
Advisor
Rebekah Oulton
Advisor Department
Civil and Environmental Engineering
Advisor College
College of Engineering
Abstract
Engineering decisions shape lasting technology that affects environmental integrity, public safety, economic stability, and social equity. As global challenges such as climate change, infrastructure vulnerability, and rapid technological advancement intensify, the responsibilities placed on engineers continue to expand. Sustainability provides a framework for addressing these interconnected pressures through systems-based design and long-term thinking. Yet, sustainability education within engineering programs remains unevenly integrated, often positioned as elective or peripheral rather than as a foundational component of professional preparation.
Prior research shows that sustainability is most frequently addressed through stand-alone courses rather than embedded across required curricula, reflecting disciplinary structures that prioritize technical problem-solving over interdisciplinary systems thinking [1]. Even when sustainability learning objectives are articulated, they are inconsistently translated into coursework and assessment, constrained by limited faculty support, insufficient training, and weak institutional incentives [2]. This thesis examines how these structural challenges manifest across engineering education using a multi-scale analytical framework (Figure 1) and proposes opportunities for integration of sustainability-focused material into existing curricula.
At the national level, this study examines ABET-accredited undergraduate engineering programs across the United States to understand how sustainability is represented in program requirements, policy language, and required coursework. At the institutional level, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, is used as a case study to evaluate students’ exposure to sustainability-focused content and identify barriers to integration through curriculum analysis, faculty input, and student survey data. At the disciplinary level, the study looks at how sustainability can be applied within specific fields, including AI-supported workflows in Computer Science, sustainability-focused senior design checklists in Mechanical Engineering, and life-cycle assessment tools in Environmental Engineering.
By examining sustainability-focused engineering education across these three levels, this research shows that sustainability can be integrated into core engineering courses without sacrificing technical rigor. It also finds that students are highly interested in engaging more with sustainability. Overall, the results offer practical, evidence-based guidance for educators, universities, and accreditation organizations working to strengthen sustainability in engineering education.
State Map Ratings
Technical_Sustainability_Index Filled out.xlsx (47 kB)
TSII ME Scorecard
Form Responses.xlsx (51 kB)
Form Responses
Included in
Civil Engineering Commons, Computer and Systems Architecture Commons, Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Environmental Engineering Commons, Mechanical Engineering Commons, Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons