Available at: https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/theses/2909
Date of Award
6-2023
Degree Name
MS in Engineering
Department/Program
Civil and Environmental Engineering
College
College of Engineering
Advisor
Amr El Badawy
Advisor Department
Civil and Environmental Engineering
Advisor College
College of Engineering
Abstract
Fresh water scarcity is an alarming issue for communities across the globe. The development of water recycling and reuse technologies has become crucial in expanding the limited water resources. Reverse osmosis (RO) is among the key processes that can treat wastewater to meet potable water reuse standards. Despite the advancements in RO membrane technologies, many challenges persist regarding the operation and maintenance of RO membranes, such as membrane fouling. Extensive research investigations have focused on developing RO membrane modifications to combat the decreased performance due to fouling. Polyethylenimine (PEI) is a promising polymer used for enhancing the anti-fouling properties of thin film composite (TFC) RO membranes. PEI, a positively charged polymer with high charge density, is commonly grafted on TFC RO membrane surfaces to produce smoother, more hydrophilic membranes to minimize fouling. However, little research is available on the optimal PEI placement within the composite RO membrane layers for enhancing antifouling properties. The current study aimed to investigate whether alternative positions within the membrane layers could yield better anti-fouling performance compared to incorporation PEI on the membrane surface.
Unmodified (i.e., control) and PEI-modified TFC RO membranes were fabricated in the laboratory. The PEI-modified membranes were produced in two variations with regards to the position of PEI in the composite membrane layer. The first variation, named PEI-1, involved immersing the polysulfone (Psf) support layer of the membrane in an aqueous PEI solution, before the active polyamide (PA) layer was formed. The second variation, named PEI-2, consisted of immersing the fully formed TFC RO membrane in an aqueous PEI solution to incorporate PEI on the surface of the active PA layer. The PEI used in the study for membrane modification had branched configuration with molecular weight of 1200 g/mole. The laboratory-scale TFC RO membranes produced herein were characterized and tested for water flux, salt rejection, and fouling behavior. The water flux and salt rejection, commonly referred to as permselectivity, of all the membranes produced were evaluated in a crossflow filtration unit. On the other hand, the fouling tests were conducted in a dead-end membrane filtration unit because of operational limitations of the crossflow unit.
The PEI-1 membrane produced a water flux of 18.7 LMH (L/m2hr) and a stable salt rejection of 82.1%. The PEI-2 membrane resulted in a water flux of 22.4 LMH and a salt rejection of 85.2%. These results indicate that incorporating PEI on the membrane PA active surface layer achieved better permselectivity compared to PEI-1, which is the membrane with PEI incorporated inside the structure (i.e., incorporated on the Psf support layer). However, both PEI-modified membranes exhibited lower permselectivity performance compared to the unmodified control membrane, which produced a water flux of 23.9 LMH and salt rejection of 88.2%.
To test fouling of the unmodified and PEI modified RO membranes, bovine serum albumin (BSA) was chosen as a model foulant based on preliminary investigations conducted herein to compare BSA to sodium alginate. After the foulant was introduced in the feed, the unmodified membrane exhibited a 31.8% total fouling ratio, the decrease in flux from the foulant solution compared to running clean DI water. However, a 90.7% flux recovery ratio was achieved when a final DI water rinse was performed. The PEI-1 membrane had a 39.7% total fouling ratio and a 81.6% flux recovery ratio after rinsing with DI water. The PEI-2 membrane showed a 43.1% total fouling ratio as a result of BSA fouling and a 94% flux recovery ratio when rinsed with DI water at the end of the fouling test.
Water contact angle (WCA) analysis confirmed that the PEI-2 membrane had the most hydrophilic surface (WCA 25.1°) compared to the control membrane (WCA 52.9°). The higher hydrophilicity of PEI-2 aligns with its higher flux recovery results, which indicated reduced membrane fouling. Furthermore, the PEI-2 membrane had a drastically lower WCA than those reported in the literature for PEI-modified membranes, which ranged from (63° – 80°). In conclusion, the increased flux recovery and surface hydrophilicity of the PEI-2 membrane indicated that the best anti-fouling performance would likely be obtained when PEI is grafted onto the surface of the active PA membrane surface. Future research is warranted to optimize the PEI-2 membrane by exploring the effect of PEI concentration, molecular weight, and structural configuration (i.e., branched versus linear), on anti-fouling performance of the membranes.