Recommended Citation
Postprint version. Published in The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, Volume 30, Issue 1, March 1, 2005, pages 47-66.
The definitive version is available at https://doi.org/10.1080/01933920590908697.
Abstract
An increasing amount of research supports group therapy as an effective treatment option for eating disorders (Moreno, 1994). In an attempt to further delineate therapeutic factors associated with productive group work, this study represents an exploratory, descriptive analysis of client and therapist perspectives on group process and outcome. Specifically, this retrospective study investigated what clients and their therapist considered important, helpful, and problematic in an aftercare group for hospitalized patients with eating disorders. The therapist and client perspectives were considered separately. These data were then classified into four categories: importance, benefits, problems, and critical incidents. A follow-up discussion explores similarities and differences between therapist and client perspectives. Implications for practice and research are presented.
Disciplines
Psychology
Copyright
2005 Taylor & Francis.
Publisher statement
This is an electronic version of an article published in The Journal for Specialists in Group Work.
URL: https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/psycd_fac/60
