College - Author 1
College of Engineering
Department - Author 1
Biomedical Engineering Department
Degree Name - Author 1
BS in Biomedical Engineering
College - Author 2
College of Engineering
Department - Author 2
Biomedical Engineering Department
Degree - Author 2
BS in Biomedical Engineering
College - Author 3
College of Engineering
Department - Author 3
Biomedical Engineering Department
Degree - Author 3
BS in Biomedical Engineering
College - Author 4
College of Engineering
Department - Author 4
Biomedical Engineering Department
Degree - Author 4
BS in Biomedical Engineering
Date
6-2023
Primary Advisor
Britta Berg-Johansen, College of Engineering, Biomedical Engineering Department
Abstract/Summary
Dr. Christopher Heylman’s research laboratory needs an improved reservoir system for their microfluidic device that reduces flow variance, failures, and the physical footprint. Current microfluidic devices have various types of reservoir systems, including vials, 96-well plates, and other cylindrical wells. Several patents and standards must be considered when designing the reservoir system. To develop a prototype the following design process was used: product discovery, project planning, product definition, conceptual design, product development. Dr. Heylman expressed various customer requirements including increased time between cell media changes, reduced leaks and blockages, and reduced flow variance. These were then translated into engineering requirements. Target values were set for these engineering requirements based on the current microfluidic device, other reservoir systems, and other information. Timelines, deadlines, and milestones were outlined for the tasks in each step of the design process. A morphology was used to create concept sketches for our project and a Pugh Matrix was used to evaluate the best concept. A CAD model was created for our concept and fluids calculations were performed to evaluate if the concept would meet the fluidic requirements. A COMSOL model was created to simulate fluid flow through the microfluidic chip and a failure modes and effects analysis was performed. Our CAD model was modified for our final design and detailed drawings were created. Dimensioning, costs, and material selection for our design are discussed, as well as manufacturing instructions and detailed test protocols. Test criteria included 2D surface area, device chamber dimensions, reservoir diameter, volume, devices without leaks, channels with flow, sterilizability, opacity (compared to old device), cell viability, time between media changes, flow velocity, flow velocity standard deviation, and cost. After analyzing the testing results, it was determined at all engineering specifications were met except for devices without leaks and channels with flow. After an explanation of how to use the platform, interpretations from testing were discussed as well as future directions for the project.
URL: https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/bmedsp/178