Abstract
In this essay, I argue that those who embrace animal rights should also embrace primitivism—the view that humans should abandon modern technology and take up something like hunter-gatherer technology instead. I call my view “animal-rights primitivism” to distinguish it from human-centered arguments for primitivism. In particular, I employ a vital-needs framework to make my argument. I argue that hunter-gatherer technology is the least harmful kind of technology, it is sufficient to meet human vital needs, and it is possible for humans to make the transition to hunter-gatherer technology while still meeting their vital needs. Alternatively, I argue that even if humans cannot make the transition while still meeting their vital needs, they are responsible for putting themselves in that situation and therefore forfeit the right to aggress against other sentient species to do so.
Recommended Citation
Schultz, James Robert
(2023)
"Animal-Rights Primitivism: A Vital Needs Argument Against Modern Technology,"
Between the Species:
Vol. 26:
Iss.
1, Article 4.
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/bts/vol26/iss1/4