Abstract
In Duty and the Beast, Andy Lamey confronts arguments for what he calls new omnivorism – recent arguments that profess to undermine the moral injunction against eating meat that is so prominent in the animal protection (animal rights) movement. Instead of rejecting animal protection as such, the new critics claim that in the pursuit of this objective the consumption of some meat is permissible or even obligatory.
Recommended Citation
Taylor, Angus
(2021)
"Review of Andy Lamey's Duty and the Beast: Should We Eat Meat in the Name of Animal Rights?,"
Between the Species:
Vol. 24:
Iss.
1, Article 9.
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/bts/vol24/iss1/9