Preprint version. Geotechnical Testing Journal, Volume 28, Issue 3, May 1, 2005, pages 275-287. Copyright © 2005 ASTM International. The definitive version is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/GTJ12483.
NOTE: At the time of publication, the author Nazli Yessiler was not yet affiliated with Cal Poly.
Image analysis was used to determine surface topography and thickness of textured geomembranes. Images of cross sections (specimen length × thickness) of geomembranes were obtained at 50× magnification using a digital optical microscope. Thickness was determined as the distance between the top and bottom surfaces along an entire cross section. For surface analysis, profiles of top and bottom surfaces were extracted from the cross section images. Amplitude, spatial, hybrid, and functional texture parameters were determined. Tests were conducted on eleven samples of HDPE and LLDPE geomembranes manufactured by co-extrusion and embossing at varying thicknesses. The geomembranes were classified into three texture categories: high, medium, and low. Anisotropy and directionality were observed for all samples to varying degrees between and within manufacturing directions, respectively. Statistical analysis of the results indicated that surface topography of geomembranes could be determined by analyzing one surface of five specimens with 50 mm length. Comparisons were made between image analysis and mechanical tests for core thickness and asperity height. Image analysis and mechanical measurements were significantly different. Recommendations were made for the redesign of the mechanical devices by sizing the components in relation to the size and spacing of geomembrane texture features.
Civil and Environmental Engineering