Abstract
In this paper I describe two distinctions about what “eating animals” entails which are often confused in conversations or arguments aimed against meat-based diets and try to show how both distinctions, on their own lights, ultimately support a concern for all fellow creatures, regardless of species or other biological categories. The distinctions in question are: the distinction between moral and nonmoral actions, presumptions about which serve to define whether or not particular topics (like meat consumption) deserve moral consideration whatsoever, and the distinction between moral and immoral actions, about which suppositions bear on both reflexive and considered moral judgments to inform agents in making meaningful normative decisions.
Recommended Citation
Holdier, A.G.
(2024)
"Two Distinctions About Eating Animals,"
Between the Species:
Vol. 27:
Iss.
1, Article 3.
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/bts/vol27/iss1/3