Abstract
As a result of Catalonia’s ban of bullfighting in 2011, in Spain there has been a renowned interest in the ethical debate about bullfighting. Most defenders of bullfighting are Spaniards, but the most systematic is French philosopher Francis Wolff. In this article, I review Wolff’s most persistent arguments in favor of bullfighting, and I offer my own refutations. Wolff argues bullfighting is not torture, bulls do not suffer, bulls must die, and bullfighting tradition must be preserved. All of these claims are dubious, as they are based on shaky assumptions and fallacious reasoning.
Recommended Citation
Andrade, Gabriel
(2018)
"Francis Wolff’s Flawed Philosophical Defense of Bullfighting,"
Between the Species:
Vol. 22:
Iss.
1, Article 4.
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/bts/vol22/iss1/4