Abstract
Projects to restore nature inevitably disrupt the plants and animals that inhabit the land to be restored. This essay addresses the significance of feral animals. Can feral animals remain in a restored nature? I argue that an answer depends on what we mean by nature and restoration. I present several different conceptions of nature and discuss what their differences mean for the goals of restoration. While the presence of feral animals is not compatible with the dualist conception of nature as that which is untouched by humans, other conceptions are more accommodating. Restoration to a benchmark of nature prior to human impact is both practically and conceptually implausible, thus more analysis is needed of alternative conceptions and their impacts on domesticated and feral plants and animals.
Recommended Citation
King, Roger J.H.
(2011)
"Feral Animals and the Restoration of Nature,"
Between the Species:
Vol. 13:
Iss.
9, Article 1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15368/bts.2009v13n9.1
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/bts/vol13/iss9/1